Cambodia: ADB and Australia-financed railway project
Since 2012, IDI supported more than 4000 households that were involuntarily resettled to make way for the rehabilitation of Cambodia’s railway system. The resettled families experienced severe hardships, including unmanageable indebtedness, loss of income and lack of access to basic services, as they were made to bear the externalized costs of this major infrastructure project. The Rehabilitation of the Railway in Cambodia Project was financed primarily by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) through a USD 84 million concessional loan and the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID), which contributed USD 23 million in aid. IDI supported the communities to advocate for the full respect of their rights under ADB safeguard policies, Cambodian law and international human rights law.
The Cambodian Government is bound to comply with ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement in relation to the more than 4000 families whose homes and small businesses are in the path of the rail lines and planned railway stations. The central principle of the policy is to provide sufficient compensation and assistance to ensure that displaced people are made at least as well-off after resettlement as compared to their previous living standards, with poor and vulnerable people supported so that their lives are improved. The Government is also bound by its international law obligations to ensure that it fully respects and protects the human rights of these families. It is obliged to use development projects such as this as an opportunity to improve the standard of living of affected people who were previously living in sub-standard conditions. This obligation includes guaranteeing that people have access to adequate housing, including all basic services and facilities, upon resettlement. As financiers of the project, the ADB and the Australian Government have a duty to monitor, supervise and support the resettlement process to ensure compliance with the policy and human rights obligations.
The reality, however, is that the Cambodian Government, the ADB and AusAID, routinely ignored the policy and legal obligations, as well as the warnings and evidence provided by affected communities and NGOs. As a result of these transgressions, many resettled families faced destitution. The report, DERAILED, published by NGO Bridges Across Borders Cambodia (now Equitable Cambodia) in February 2012, which was authored by IDI Legal Director Natalie Bugalski, found that affected families faced threats and intimidation during the resettlement process and that compensation amounts were well below the cost of a basic adequate house in Cambodia. Some of the resettlement sites were too far away from former residences, urban centers and livelihood opportunities. This economic displacement of resettled families led to a drop in household incomes, exacerbating the financial stress caused by the payment of inadequate compensation. Promised income restoration support programs only commenced months after resettlement took place and were piecemeal and ineffective. Families were forced to assume unmanageable debt burdens in order to cope with their displacement and they fear losing their plots of land at resettlement sites to creditors as a result. Many people have said that despite being aware of the risks of indebtedness they felt they had no choice but to borrow to meet the basic needs of their families including food.
Complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission
On October 4, 2012, IDI and Equitable Cambodia submitted a complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) on behalf of 30 affected families. The extra-territorial complaint alleges that the Australian Government failed to uphold its international human rights obligations by providing significant funding to the railway project without taking sufficient measures to safeguard against breaches of human rights.
In addition to the direct reparations for breaches of human rights of affected persons, the complaint calls upon AusAID to adopt human rights safeguard policies and practices including a requirement to conduct human rights impact assessments for all projects to which it is considering providing support.
IDI and Equitable Cambodia received the Commission’s finding on jurisdiction in December 2013. The Commission declined to conduct an inquiry into the complaint because it found that the complainants were not subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction due to the lack of effective control by Australia over those alleging human rights violations resulting from the Railway project in Cambodia. In IDI’s opinion, the Commission took a conservative and outmoded view of jurisdiction, which failed to reflect the current and prevailing jurisprudence on extra-territorial human rights obligations.
Click here to view the complaint.
Click here to view the Commission’s findings.
Request to the ADB Compliance Review Panel
On August 28, 2012, IDI submitted a request for investigation of the resettlement process to the Compliance Review Panel (CRP), the ADB’s internal accountability mechanism, on behalf of affected families who have asked IDI to represent them through the process.
The complaint describes a litany of problems and non-compliance with the resettlement process that have inflicted hardships on hundreds of poor families. It calls for a number of remedies from the ADB including reimbursement for the actual costs of replacing lost assets, at least enough compensation to build an adequate home and meet basic needs, debt relief, adequate basic services at the relocation sites, and support to get their children back into school. The complaint was registered by CRP on September 4, 2012.
After a 17-month investigation, the CRP issued a scathing report, which found that the ADB failed to comply with its policies and procedures, leaving a substantial number of affected households worse off and impoverished. The Panel found that families affected by the Railway project “suffered loss of property, livelihoods, and incomes, and as a result have borne a disproportionate cost and burden of the development efforts funded by ADB.” According to the Panel, ADB’s “inadequate attention to addressing the resettlement, public communications and disclosure requirements of its own policies…has led to significant yet avoidable adverse social impact on mostly poor and vulnerable people.”
The Panel emphasized: “the need for an urgent, firm, and clear message to ADB Management that resettlement, environmental, and public disclosure issues should be taken seriously and accorded the priority consideration they deserve.” It found that in this case, as in other cases that it had reviewed, these issued were treated by ADB as “mere add-ons.” The Panel concluded that: “ADB operational, sectoral, and regional staff must undergo a mind shift in the treatment of resettlement, environment, and public disclosure and consultation. Their perspective must be based on the recognition already existing in ADB’s safeguard policies that involuntary resettlement is a development opportunity, intrinsic to achieving the developmental goals of projects.”
The Panel made a number of recommendations for remedies, including establishing a $3 – $4 million ‘compensation deficit payment scheme’; improving facilities at resettlement sites; extending and expanding the income restoration program; establishing of a debt workout scheme for highly indebted households; improving the functioning of the grievance redress mechanism; capacity-building for the Cambodian authorities responsible for resettlement; and adopting specific safeguards for the development of a freight facility which respects the land rights of families in the “Samrong Estate” area.
On January 30, 2014, ADB’s Board of Directors approved the Panel’s findings and slightly modified recommendations.
IDI, Equitable Cambodia and the affected communities who brought the complaint welcomed the CRP’s report and the Board’s decision and have called upon ADB Management to develop a robust remedial action plan to operationalize the decision.
On August 30, 2015, 22 representatives of families remaining along the railway tracks filed another complaint to the CRP with support from IDI and Equitable Cambodia. The complaint presents new evidence of ADB acts and omissions that threaten material harm to the complainants which were not previously addressed by the CRP in its earlier investigation.
After conducting an initial assessment, including a site visit, the panel found that the second complaint was not eligible for further investigation because the issues had already been considered by the panel in its previous compliance review report. However, the panel stated the “complainants grievances are real and persistent” and that “they need to be – and can be – adequately and urgently addressed.” According to the panel, there was still “prima facie evidence of noncompliance with ADB’s operational policies and procedures and prima facie evidence that this noncompliance with ADB policies has led to harm or is likely to lead to future harm.” The panel called for these grievances to be dealt with under the existing remedial action plan that was adopted by ADB’s board following the previous investigation.
Watch this video to hear directly from the affected people:
Media releases and news articles
Press Release: Cambodian Railway Development Causes Human Rights Violations – AusAid complicit, Complaint Submitted Today to the Australian Human Rights Commission, Inclusive Development International and Equitable Cambodia, 5 October 2012
Reports and Briefings
News & Updates
New Report: Backers of Collapsed Laos Dam Must Be Held Accountable
A joint report released today by International Rivers and Inclusive Development International finds that one year after the devastating collapse of saddle dam D of the Xe Pian-Xe Namnoy hydropower project in southern Laos, none of the entities backing andMore ▶︎
Opinion: Can the World Bank clean up its fossil fuel problem? | Devex
The IFC’s Green Equity Strategy could be a pivotal engine for transformation — if it truly rises to the challenge. Inclusive Development International's David Pred and Bank Information Center Europe's Nezir Sinani explain.More ▶︎
Cambodian farmers take Thai sugar giant to court | Al’Jazeera
Phnom Penh, Cambodia - After years of protesting, two Cambodian farmers make their case this week in a Bangkok court against Thai sugar giant Mitr Phol, who they blame for the loss of their livelihoods.More ▶︎
Uncalculated Risks: Threats and Attacks Against Human Rights Defenders and the Role of Development Financiers
Human rights defenders are a cornerstone of sustainable development. Yet today, their critical work comes at an unacceptable cost. Inclusive Development International is one of over 100 groups working to expose the uncalculated risks of mega-projects and other ill-planned developmentMore ▶︎
When funding fuels fire: the ins and outs of responsible mining finance – Mine | Issue 81 | June 19
The World Bank’s Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) is currently considering a complaint made against the International Finance Corporation, a sister organisation of the World Bank, for funding the expansion of a controversial bauxite mining project. Such grievances are not uncommon and it is hard not to wonder, is CAO powerful enough to hold organisations, including its own, to account? Heidi Vella investigatesMore ▶︎
International call on banks: Don’t finance the East Africa Crude Oil Pipeline
(May 28, 2019) – A coalition of African and international organizations is today calling on South Africa’s Standard Bank and Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp (SMBC) to withdraw from their role as lead arrangers for a massive oil pipeline under construction in UgandaMore ▶︎